> Complexity is the main problem I agree, replicating multiple cores otherwise means multiple rsyncd processes, and true enough that management of shell scripts multiplies in complexity.
2009/12/8 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@corp.aol.com>: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Jason Rutherglen > <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Yes. I'd highly recommend using the Java replication though. >> >> Is there a reason? I understand it's new etc, however I think one >> issue with it is it's somewhat non-native access to the filesystem. >> Can you illustrate a real world advantage other than the enhanced >> admin screens? > Complexity is the main problem w/ rsync based replication. you have to > manage so many processes and monitor them separately. The other > problem is managing snapshots. These snapshots need to be cleaned up > every now and then. You do not have enough info on what is > heppening/happened >> >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar >> <shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Jason Rutherglen < >>> jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> If I've got multiple cores on a server, I guess I need multiple >>>> rsyncd's running (if using the shell scripts)? >>>> >>> >>> Yes. I'd highly recommend using the Java replication though. >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >>> >> > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > Noble Paul | Systems Architect| AOL | http://aol.com >
