On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:04 AM, A. Steven Anderson wrote:
dynamic fields don't make it worse ... the number of actaul field
names
you sort on makes it worse.
If you sort on 100 fields, the cost is the same regardless of
wether all
100 of those fields exist because of a single <dynamicField/>
declaration,
or 100 distinct <field/> declarations.
Ahh...thanks for the clarification.
So, in general, there is no *significant* performance difference
with using
dynamic fields. Correct?
Correct. There's not even really an "insignificant" performance
difference. A dynamic field is the same as a regular field in
practically every way on the search side of things.
Erik
