> > dynamic fields don't make it worse ... the number of actaul field names > you sort on makes it worse. > > If you sort on 100 fields, the cost is the same regardless of wether all > 100 of those fields exist because of a single <dynamicField/> declaration, > or 100 distinct <field/> declarations. >
Ahh...thanks for the clarification. So, in general, there is no *significant* performance difference with using dynamic fields. Correct? -- A. Steven Anderson Independent Consultant st...@asanderson.com
