It may be nice to tell us why you need payloads? There may be other ways of solving your problem than adding payload support to Solr? Anyway, I don't see payload support before 1.5
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Sumit Aggarwal <sumit.kaggar...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hey Nobel, > Any comments on Grant suggestion. > > Thanks, > -Sumit > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Sumit Aggarwal > <sumit.kaggar...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > Hi Walter, > > I do have a search server where i have implemented things using payload > > feature itself. These days i am evaluating solr to get rid of my own > search > > server. For that i need payloads feature in solr itself. I raised a > related > > question and got a message from *Grant* as > > * "**I added a new DelimitedPayloadTokenFilter to Lucene that should make > > it really easy to send in payloads "inline" in Solr XML, so what remains > to > > be done, I think is:* > > *1. Create a new TokenFilterFactory for the TokenFilter > > **2. Hook in some syntax support for creating a BoostingTermQuery in the > > Query Parsers.**"* > > > > Now can any one provide any custom code to do what grant mentioned. > > > > Thanks, > > Sumit > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Walter Underwood < > wunderw...@netflix.com>wrote: > > > >> That doesn't require payloads. I was doing that with Solr 1.1. Define > two > >> fields, stemmed and exact, with different analyzer chains. Use copyfield > >> to > >> load the same info into both. With the dismax handler, search both > fields > >> with a higher boost on the exact field. > >> > >> wunder > >> > >> On 7/14/09 7:39 AM, "Toby Cole" <toby.c...@semantico.com> wrote: > >> > >> > We're looking into using payloads to improve relevance for stemmed > >> > terms, using the payload to store the unstemmed term, boosting the > >> > term if there's an exact match with the payloads. > >> > >> > > > -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
