Hey Nobel, Any comments on Grant suggestion. Thanks, -Sumit
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Sumit Aggarwal <sumit.kaggar...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Walter, > I do have a search server where i have implemented things using payload > feature itself. These days i am evaluating solr to get rid of my own search > server. For that i need payloads feature in solr itself. I raised a related > question and got a message from *Grant* as > * "**I added a new DelimitedPayloadTokenFilter to Lucene that should make > it really easy to send in payloads "inline" in Solr XML, so what remains to > be done, I think is:* > *1. Create a new TokenFilterFactory for the TokenFilter > **2. Hook in some syntax support for creating a BoostingTermQuery in the > Query Parsers.**"* > > Now can any one provide any custom code to do what grant mentioned. > > Thanks, > Sumit > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Walter Underwood > <wunderw...@netflix.com>wrote: > >> That doesn't require payloads. I was doing that with Solr 1.1. Define two >> fields, stemmed and exact, with different analyzer chains. Use copyfield >> to >> load the same info into both. With the dismax handler, search both fields >> with a higher boost on the exact field. >> >> wunder >> >> On 7/14/09 7:39 AM, "Toby Cole" <toby.c...@semantico.com> wrote: >> >> > We're looking into using payloads to improve relevance for stemmed >> > terms, using the payload to store the unstemmed term, boosting the >> > term if there's an exact match with the payloads. >> >> >