Hey Nobel,
Any comments on Grant suggestion.

Thanks,
-Sumit

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Sumit Aggarwal
<sumit.kaggar...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Walter,
> I do have a search server where i have implemented things using payload
> feature itself. These days i am evaluating solr to get rid of my own search
> server. For that i need payloads feature in solr itself. I raised a related
> question and got a message from *Grant* as
> * "**I added a new DelimitedPayloadTokenFilter to Lucene that should make
> it really easy to send in payloads "inline" in Solr XML, so what remains to
> be done, I think is:*
> *1. Create a new TokenFilterFactory for the TokenFilter
> **2. Hook in some syntax support for creating a BoostingTermQuery in the
> Query Parsers.**"*
>
> Now can any one provide any custom code to do what grant mentioned.
>
> Thanks,
> Sumit
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Walter Underwood 
> <wunderw...@netflix.com>wrote:
>
>> That doesn't require payloads. I was doing that with Solr 1.1. Define two
>> fields, stemmed and exact, with different analyzer chains. Use copyfield
>> to
>> load the same info into both. With the dismax handler, search both fields
>> with a higher boost on the exact field.
>>
>> wunder
>>
>> On 7/14/09 7:39 AM, "Toby Cole" <toby.c...@semantico.com> wrote:
>>
>> > We're looking into using payloads to improve relevance for stemmed
>> > terms, using the payload to store the unstemmed term, boosting the
>> > term if there's an exact match with the payloads.
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to