Hi, In our specific implementation this is not really an issue, but I can imagine it could impact performance. I guess a new thread could spawned, which takes care of any performance issues, thanks for pointing it out. I'll post a message when I coded the change.
Regards, Patrick -----Original Message----- From: rswart [mailto:rjsw...@gmail.com] Sent: dinsdag 26 mei 2009 16:42 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Solr statistics of top searches and results returned If this is is not done in an async way wouldn't this have a serious performance impact? Plaatje, Patrick wrote: > > Hi all, > > I created a script that uses a Solr Search Component, which hooks into > the main solr core and catches the searches being done. After this it > tokenizes the search and send both the tokenized as well as the > original query to another Solr core. I have not written a factory for > this, but if required, it shouldn't be so hard to modify the script > and code Database support into it. > > You can find the source here: > > http://www.ipros.nl/uploads/Stats-component.zip > > It includes a README, and a schema.xml that should be used. > > Please let me know you're thoughts. > > Best, > > Patrick > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Umar Shah [mailto:u...@wisdomtap.com] > Sent: vrijdag 22 mei 2009 10:03 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Solr statistics of top searches and results returned > > Hi, > > good feature to have, > maintaining top N would also require storing all the search queries > done so far and keep updating (or atleast in some time window). > > having pluggable persistent storage for all time search queries would > be great. > > tell me how can I help? > > -umar > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar > <shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Grant Ingersoll >> <gsing...@apache.org>wrote: >> >>> >>> I think you will want some type of persistence mechanism otherwise >>> you will end up consuming a lot of resources keeping track of all >>> the query strings, unless I'm missing something. Either a Lucene >>> index (Solr core) or the option of embedding a DB. Ideally, it >>> would be pluggable such that people could choose their storage mechanism. >>> Most people do this kind of thing offline via log analysis as logs >>> can grow quite large quite quickly. >>> >> >> For a general case, yes. But I was thinking more of a top 'n' queries >> as a running statistic. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-statistics-of-top-searches-and-results-returned-tp23621779p23724277.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
