Hi, good feature to have, maintaining top N would also require storing all the search queries done so far and keep updating (or atleast in some time window).
having pluggable persistent storage for all time search queries would be great. tell me how can I help? -umar On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>wrote: > >> >> I think you will want some type of persistence mechanism otherwise you will >> end up consuming a lot of resources keeping track of all the query strings, >> unless I'm missing something. Either a Lucene index (Solr core) or the >> option of embedding a DB. Ideally, it would be pluggable such that people >> could choose their storage mechanism. Most people do this kind of thing >> offline via log analysis as logs can grow quite large quite quickly. >> > > For a general case, yes. But I was thinking more of a top 'n' queries as a > running statistic. > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >
