On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:57 PM, wojtekpia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yonik Seeley wrote: >> >> Are you doing commits at any time? >> One possibility is the caching mechanism (weak-ref on the >> IndexReader)... that's going to be changing soon hopefully. >> >> -Yonik >> > > No commits during this test. Should I start looking into my heap size > distribution and garbage collector selection?
Hmmm, OK. The other big difference would then be that retrieving the top facets requires creating a Lucene TermEnum (not all facet values are stored in memory). The lucene version in Solr has changed since I did long running tests... with various Lucene changes to thread-local caching, etc. I'll try and reproduce. Or maybe this is somehow a GC bug just tickled by the current caching mechanism? (weak hash map) -Yonik
