wojtek, you can report back the numbers if possible It would be nice to know how the new impl performs in real-world
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:10 PM, wojtekpia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is there a configurable way to switch to the previous implementation? I'd >> like to see exactly how it affects performance in my case. > > Thanks for the reminder, I need to document this in the wiki. > > facet.method=enum (enumerate terms and do intersections, the old default) > facet.method=fc (fieldcache method, the new default) > > -Yonik > >> >> Yonik Seeley wrote: >>> >>> And if you want to verify that the new faceting code has indeed kicked >>> in, some statistics are logged, like: >>> >>> Nov 24, 2008 11:14:32 PM org.apache.solr.request.UnInvertedField uninvert >>> INFO: UnInverted multi-valued field features, memSize=14584, time=47, >>> phase1=47, >>> nTerms=285, bigTerms=99, termInstances=186 >>> >>> -Yonik >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/new-faceting-algorithm-tp20674902p20797812.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > -- --Noble Paul
