> The performance of DIH is likely to be faster than SolrJ. > Because , it does not have the overhead of an http request.
Understood. However, we may not have the option of co-locating the data to be injested with the Solr server. > What is your data source? I am assuming it is xml. Yes. Incoming stream of xml documents to a directory. > SolrJ cannot directly index xml . You may need to read docs from xml before solrj can index it. Understood. We'd like to compare the performance difference of DIH vs. custom xml parsing + SolrJ. A. Steven Anderson 410-418-9908 VSTI 443-790-4269 cell
