The performance of DIH is likely to be faster than SolrJ. Because , it does not have the overhead of an http request. What is your data source? I am assuming it is xml. SolrJ cannot directly index xml . You may need to read docs from xml before solrj can index it.
--Noble On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Steven Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings! > > I've been asked to do some indexing performance testing on Solr 1.3 > using large XML document data sets (10M-60M docs) with DIH versus SolrJ. > > > Does anyone have any suggestions where I might find a good data set this > size? > > I saw the wikipedia dump reference in the DIH wiki, but that is only in > the 7M+ doc range. > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Steve > > > -- --Noble Paul
