What does „not work correctly mean“? Have you checked that all fields are stored or doc values?
> Am 17.07.2020 um 11:26 schrieb yo tomi <yosshii0...@gmail.com>: > > Hi All > > Sorry, above settings are contrary with each other. > Actually, following setting does not work properly. > --- > <updateRequestProcessorChain name="skip-empty"> > <processor class="TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > </updateRequestProcessorChain> > --- > And follows is working as expected. > --- > <updateRequestProcessorChain name="skip-empty"> > <processor class="solr.DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory"/> > <processor class="TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > </updateRequestProcessorChain> > --- > > Thanks, > Yoshiaki > > > 2020年7月17日(金) 16:32 yo tomi <yosshii0...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi, All >> When I did AtomicUpdate on SolrCloud by the following setting, it does not >> work properly. >> >> --- >> <updateRequestProcessorChain name="skip-empty"> >> <processor class="solr.DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory"/> >> <processor class="TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> >> <processor class="RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> >> <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" /> >> <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> >> </updateRequestProcessorChain> >> --- >> When changed as follows and made it work, it became as expected. >> --- >> <updateRequestProcessorChain name="skip-empty"> >> <processor class="TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> >> <processor class="RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> >> <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" /> >> <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> >> </updateRequestProcessorChain> >> --- >> The later setting and the way of using post-processor could make the same >> result, I though, >> but using post-processor, bug of SOLR-8030 makes me not feel like using it. >> By the latter setting even, is there any possibility of SOLR-8030 to become? >> Seeing the source code, tlog which is from leader comes to Replica seems to >> be processed correctly with UpdateRequestProcessor, >> the latter setting had not been the right one for the bug, I though.Anyone >> knows the most appropriate way to configure AtomicUpdate on SolrCloud? >> >> Thanks, >> Yoshiaki >> >>
