Hi All Sorry, above settings are contrary with each other. Actually, following setting does not work properly. --- <updateRequestProcessorChain name="skip-empty"> <processor class="TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> <processor class="RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" /> <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> </updateRequestProcessorChain> --- And follows is working as expected. --- <updateRequestProcessorChain name="skip-empty"> <processor class="solr.DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory"/> <processor class="TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> <processor class="RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" /> <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> </updateRequestProcessorChain> ---
Thanks, Yoshiaki 2020年7月17日(金) 16:32 yo tomi <yosshii0...@gmail.com>: > Hi, All > When I did AtomicUpdate on SolrCloud by the following setting, it does not > work properly. > > --- > <updateRequestProcessorChain name="skip-empty"> > <processor class="solr.DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory"/> > <processor class="TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > </updateRequestProcessorChain> > --- > When changed as follows and made it work, it became as expected. > --- > <updateRequestProcessorChain name="skip-empty"> > <processor class="TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > </updateRequestProcessorChain> > --- > The later setting and the way of using post-processor could make the same > result, I though, > but using post-processor, bug of SOLR-8030 makes me not feel like using it. > By the latter setting even, is there any possibility of SOLR-8030 to become? > Seeing the source code, tlog which is from leader comes to Replica seems to > be processed correctly with UpdateRequestProcessor, > the latter setting had not been the right one for the bug, I though.Anyone > knows the most appropriate way to configure AtomicUpdate on SolrCloud? > > Thanks, > Yoshiaki > >