Hi All

Sorry, above settings are contrary with each other.
Actually, following setting does not work properly.
---
<updateRequestProcessorChain name="skip-empty">
 <processor class="TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" />
 <processor class="RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" />
 <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" />
 <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" />
</updateRequestProcessorChain>
---
And follows is working as expected.
---
<updateRequestProcessorChain name="skip-empty">
 <processor class="solr.DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory"/>
 <processor class="TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" />
 <processor class="RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" />
 <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" />
 <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" />
</updateRequestProcessorChain>
---

Thanks,
Yoshiaki


2020年7月17日(金) 16:32 yo tomi <yosshii0...@gmail.com>:

> Hi, All
> When I did AtomicUpdate on SolrCloud by the following setting, it does not 
> work properly.
>
> ---
> <updateRequestProcessorChain name="skip-empty">
>  <processor class="solr.DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory"/>
>  <processor class="TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" />
>  <processor class="RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" />
>  <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" />
>  <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" />
> </updateRequestProcessorChain>
> ---
> When changed as follows and made it work, it became as expected.
> ---
> <updateRequestProcessorChain name="skip-empty">
>  <processor class="TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" />
>  <processor class="RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" />
>  <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" />
>  <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" />
> </updateRequestProcessorChain>
> ---
> The later setting and the way of using post-processor could make the same 
> result, I though,
> but using post-processor, bug of SOLR-8030 makes me not feel like using it.
> By the latter setting even, is there any possibility of SOLR-8030 to become? 
> Seeing the source code, tlog which is from leader comes to Replica seems to 
> be processed correctly with UpdateRequestProcessor,
> the latter setting had not been the right one for the bug, I though.Anyone 
> knows the most appropriate way to configure AtomicUpdate on SolrCloud?
>
> Thanks,
> Yoshiaki
>
>

Reply via email to