Do we even call it the master/slave mode? I thought we had 2 modes * Standalone mode * SolrCloud mode
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:00 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree in general with what Trey and Jan said and have suggested. I > personally like to use "leader/follower". It's true that somewhat collides > with SolrCloud terminology, but that's not a problem IMO, now that replica > types exist, the “role” of the replica (leader vs. non-leader/follower) > doesn’t specify the internals of how they behave, the replica type defines > that. So, in a non-SolrCloud world, they would still be leader/followers > regardless of how they perform that role. > > I also agree that the name of the role is not that important, more the > "mode" of the architecture needs to be renamed. We tend to refer to > "SolrCloud mode" and "Master/Slave mode", the main part in all this (IMO) > is to change that "mode" name. I kind of like Trey's suggestion of "Managed > Clustering" vs. "Manual Clustering" Mode (Or "managed" vs "manual"), but > still haven't made up my mind (especially the fact that "manual" usually > doesn't really mean "manual", is just "you build your tools”)… > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:38 PM Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> > wrote: > > > > On Jun 19, 2020, at 7:48 AM, Phill Campbell > > <sirgilli...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > > > > Delegator - Handler > > > > > > A common pattern we are all aware of. Pretty simple. > > > > The Solr master does not delegate and the slave does not handle. > > The master is a server that handles replication requests from the > > slave. > > > > Delegator/handler is a common pattern, but it is not the pattern > > that describes traditional Solr replication. > > > > wunder > > Walter Underwood > > wun...@wunderwood.org > > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > > > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul
