supervisor The name change should probably happen as part of the major overseer overhaul that is planned. Perhaps there won’t be much left of the overseer if more operations can be done without a cluster-wide lock?
Jan > 19. jun. 2020 kl. 20:03 skrev Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>: > > I just split this off with a different subject line for the “overseer” > discussion. > That seems independent of the other choices. > > I’ve heard these suggestions: > > * orchestrator > * director > * coordinator > * cluster manager > * manager > > There is a thing called “process orchestration” which is at a higher level > than > what the overseer does. It might be something like all the customer > interactions > in a billing process. That usage might be confusing for the term > “orchestrator”. > > wunder > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > >> On Jun 18, 2020, at 10:44 PM, Thomas Corthals <tho...@klascement.net> wrote: >> >> Since "overseer" is also problematic, I'd like to propose "orchestrator" as >> an alternative. >> >> Thomas >
