Hi,

Yes. I meant facet.mincount only.


Thanks
Saurabh

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 8:51 PM Vadim Ivanov <
vadim.iva...@spb.ntk-intourist.ru> wrote:

> group.mincount ? Never heard of it. It exists?
> May be you have in mind facet.mincount and second approach mentioned
> earlier:
>
> > > > > Next approach was to use facet first with facet.mincount=3, then
> > > > > find docs ids by every facet result  and then delete docs by id.
> > > > > That way seems to me  too complicated for the task.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Saurabh Sharma [mailto:saurabh.infoe...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 4:36 PM
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Solr grouping with offset
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > If you want to sort on your field and want to put a count restriction
> too then
> > you have to use mincount. That seems to be best approach for your
> > problem.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Saurabh
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 6:24 PM Vadim Ivanov < vadim.iva...@spb.ntk-
> > intourist.ru> wrote:
> >
> > > Example of gtouping with empty groups in results:
> > > Filed1 = rr_group, field2 = rr_updatedate Problem is that I have tens
> > > of million groups in result and only several thousand with  "numFound"
> > > >2
> > >
> > > "params":{
> > >       "q":"*:* ",
> > >       "group.sort":"rr_updatedate desc ",
> > >       "group.limit":"-1",
> > >       "fl":"rr_group,rr_adl,rr_createdate,rr_calctaskkey ",
> > >       "group.offset":"2",
> > >       "wt":"json",
> > >       "group.field":"rr_group",
> > >       "group":"true"}},
> > >   "grouped":{
> > >     "rr_group":{
> > >       "matches":41475082,
> > >       "groups":[{
> > >           "groupValue":"164370:20200707:23:251",
> > >           "doclist":{"numFound":1,"start":2,"docs":[]
> > >           }},
> > >         {
> > >           "groupValue":"163942:20200708:22:251",
> > >           "doclist":{"numFound":1,"start":2,"docs":[]
> > >           }},
> > >         {
> > >           "groupValue":"163943:20200708:22:251",
> > >           "doclist":{"numFound":1,"start":2,"docs":[]
> > >           }},
> > >         {
> > >           "groupValue":"164355:20200708:22:251",
> > >           "doclist":{"numFound":1,"start":2,"docs":[]
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Paras Lehana [mailto:paras.leh...@indiamart.com]
> > > > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 3:37 PM
> > > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Solr grouping with offset
> > > >
> > > > It would be better if you give us an example.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 17:20, Vadim Ivanov
> > > > <vadim.iva...@intourist.ru.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello guys!
> > > > > I need an advise. My task is to delete some documents in
> collection.
> > > > > Del algorithm is following:
> > > > > Group docs by field1  with sort by field2 and delete every 3 and
> > > > > following occurrences in every group.
> > > > > Unfortunately I didn't find easy way to do so.
> > > > > Closest approach was to use group.offset = 2, but  result set is
> > > > > polluted with empty groups with no documents (they have less then
> > > > > 3
> > > docs
> > > > in group).
> > > > > May be I'm missing smth and there is way not to receive empty
> > > > > groups in results?
> > > > > Next approach was to use facet first with facet.mincount=3, then
> > > > > find docs ids by every facet result  and then delete docs by id.
> > > > > That way seems to me  too complicated for the task.
> > > > > What's the best use case for the task?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > *Paras Lehana* [65871]
> > > > Development Engineer, *Auto-Suggest*, IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd,
> > > >
> > > > 11th Floor, Tower 2, Assotech Business Cresterra, Plot No. 22,
> > > > Sector
> > > 135,
> > > > Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India 201305
> > > >
> > > > Mob.: +91-9560911996
> > > > Work: 0120-4056700 | Extn:
> > > > *11096*
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > >
> > > >  <https://www.facebook.com/IndiaMART/videos/578196442936091/>
> > >
> > >
>
>

Reply via email to