group.mincount ? Never heard of it. It exists?
May be you have in mind facet.mincount and second approach mentioned earlier:

> > > > Next approach was to use facet first with facet.mincount=3, then
> > > > find docs ids by every facet result  and then delete docs by id.
> > > > That way seems to me  too complicated for the task.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saurabh Sharma [mailto:saurabh.infoe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 4:36 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr grouping with offset
> 
> Hi,
> 
> If you want to sort on your field and want to put a count restriction too then
> you have to use mincount. That seems to be best approach for your
> problem.
> 
> Thanks
> Saurabh
> 
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 6:24 PM Vadim Ivanov < vadim.iva...@spb.ntk-
> intourist.ru> wrote:
> 
> > Example of gtouping with empty groups in results:
> > Filed1 = rr_group, field2 = rr_updatedate Problem is that I have tens
> > of million groups in result and only several thousand with  "numFound"
> > >2
> >
> > "params":{
> >       "q":"*:* ",
> >       "group.sort":"rr_updatedate desc ",
> >       "group.limit":"-1",
> >       "fl":"rr_group,rr_adl,rr_createdate,rr_calctaskkey ",
> >       "group.offset":"2",
> >       "wt":"json",
> >       "group.field":"rr_group",
> >       "group":"true"}},
> >   "grouped":{
> >     "rr_group":{
> >       "matches":41475082,
> >       "groups":[{
> >           "groupValue":"164370:20200707:23:251",
> >           "doclist":{"numFound":1,"start":2,"docs":[]
> >           }},
> >         {
> >           "groupValue":"163942:20200708:22:251",
> >           "doclist":{"numFound":1,"start":2,"docs":[]
> >           }},
> >         {
> >           "groupValue":"163943:20200708:22:251",
> >           "doclist":{"numFound":1,"start":2,"docs":[]
> >           }},
> >         {
> >           "groupValue":"164355:20200708:22:251",
> >           "doclist":{"numFound":1,"start":2,"docs":[]
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Paras Lehana [mailto:paras.leh...@indiamart.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 3:37 PM
> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Solr grouping with offset
> > >
> > > It would be better if you give us an example.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 17:20, Vadim Ivanov
> > > <vadim.iva...@intourist.ru.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello guys!
> > > > I need an advise. My task is to delete some documents in collection.
> > > > Del algorithm is following:
> > > > Group docs by field1  with sort by field2 and delete every 3 and
> > > > following occurrences in every group.
> > > > Unfortunately I didn't find easy way to do so.
> > > > Closest approach was to use group.offset = 2, but  result set is
> > > > polluted with empty groups with no documents (they have less then
> > > > 3
> > docs
> > > in group).
> > > > May be I'm missing smth and there is way not to receive empty
> > > > groups in results?
> > > > Next approach was to use facet first with facet.mincount=3, then
> > > > find docs ids by every facet result  and then delete docs by id.
> > > > That way seems to me  too complicated for the task.
> > > > What's the best use case for the task?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > *Paras Lehana* [65871]
> > > Development Engineer, *Auto-Suggest*, IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd,
> > >
> > > 11th Floor, Tower 2, Assotech Business Cresterra, Plot No. 22,
> > > Sector
> > 135,
> > > Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India 201305
> > >
> > > Mob.: +91-9560911996
> > > Work: 0120-4056700 | Extn:
> > > *11096*
> > >
> > > --
> > > *
> > > *
> > >
> > >  <https://www.facebook.com/IndiaMART/videos/578196442936091/>
> >
> >

Reply via email to