Although we are having a avg of 200 facet fields in the search request all
of them will not be having values in each request.
Max of 50-60 facet fields will be having some value.
And we are using function query,is it having some performance impact.
On Sat, 18 Jan, 2020, 11:10 PM Walter Underwood, <wun...@wunderwood.org>
wrote:
> For indexing, is the master node CPU around 90%? If not, you aren’t
> sending requests fast enough or your disk is slow.
>
> For querying, 200 facet fields is HUGE. That will take a lot of Java heap
> memory and will be slow. Each facet fields requires large in-memory arrays
> and sorting.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>
> > On Jan 18, 2020, at 9:29 AM, Rajdeep Sahoo <rajdeepsahoo2...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi shawn,
> > Thanks for this info,
> > Could you Please address my below query,
> >
> >
> > We are having 2.3 million documents and size is 2.5 gb.
> > With this data do we need solr cloud.
> >
> > 10 core cpu and 24 gb ram . 16 slave nodes.
> >
> > Still some of the queries are taking 50 sec at solr end.
> > As we are using solr 4.6 .
> > Other thing is we are having 200 (avg) facet fields in a query.
> > And 30 searchable fields.
> > Is there any way to identify why it is taking 50 sec for a query.
> > Multiple concurrent requests are there.
> >
> > And how to optimize the search response time as it is almost 1 mins for
> > some request.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Jan, 2020, 10:52 PM Shawn Heisey, <apa...@elyograg.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 1/18/2020 9:55 AM, Rajdeep Sahoo wrote:
> >>> We do parallel indexing in production,
> >>>
> >>> What about search performance in solr cloud in comparison with master
> >>> slave.
> >>> And what about block join performance in solr cloud.
> >>> Do we need to increase the infra for solr cloud as we would be
> >>> maintaining multiple shard and replica.
> >>> Is there any co relation with master slave set up.
> >>
> >> As I said before, SolrCloud is not a magic bullet that solves
> >> performance issues. If the index characteristics are the same (number
> >> of docs, total size), performance in SolrCloud will be nearly identical
> >> to non-cloud.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shawn
> >>
>
>
