Agreed with the above. what’s your idea of “huge”? I have 600 ish gb in one core plus another 250x2 in two more on the same standalone solr instance and it runs more than fine
> On Jan 18, 2020, at 11:31 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > > On 1/18/2020 1:05 AM, Rajdeep Sahoo wrote: >> Our Index size is huge and in master slave the full indexing time is almost >> 24 hrs. >> In future the no of documents will increase. >> So,please some one recommend about the no of nodes and configuration like >> ram and cpu core for solr cloud. > > Indexing is not going to be any faster in SolrCloud. It would probably be a > little bit slower. The best way to speed up indexing, whether running > SolrCloud or not, is to make your indexing processes run in parallel, so that > multiple batches of documents are being indexed at the same time. > > SolrCloud is not a magic bullet that solves all problems. It's just a > different way of managing indexes that has more automation, and makes initial > setup of a distributed index a lot easier. It doesn't do the job any faster > than running without SolrCloud. The legacy master/slave mode is likely to be > a little bit faster. > > You haven't provided any of the information required for us to guess about > the system requirements. And it will be a guess ... we could be completely > wrong. > > https://lucidworks.com/post/sizing-hardware-in-the-abstract-why-we-dont-have-a-definitive-answer/ > > Thanks, > Shawn
