Follow up https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13139
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 2:46 PM Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > I did some testing by tweaking DateRangeFieldTest and witness that > 2000-11T13 is parsed as 2000-11-13 see > > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/f083473b891e596def2877b5429fcfa6db175464/lucene/spatial-extras/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial/prefix/tree/DateRangePrefixTree.java#L462 > Don't know what to do with it... At least I'm going to update the doc. > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:42 PM Jeremy Smith <jas2...@cornell.edu> wrote: > >> Hi Mikhail, thanks for the response. I'm probably missing something, but >> what makes 2000-11T13 contiguous and 2000T13 not contiguous? They seem >> pretty similar to me, but only the former is supported. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jeremy >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> >> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2019 12:59:31 AM >> To: solr-user >> Subject: Re: DateRangeField requires month? >> >> Hello, Jeremy. >> >> See below. >> >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:09 PM Jeremy Smith <jas2...@cornell.edu> wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > I am trying to use the DateRangeField and ran into an interesting >> > issue. According to the documentation ( >> > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/working-with-dates.html), >> these >> > are both valid for the DateRangeField: 2000-11 and 2000-11T13. I can >> > confirm this is working in 7.6. I would also expect to be able to use >> > 2000T13, which would mean any time in the year 2000 between 1300 and >> 1400. >> >> >> Nope. This is not a range, but multiple ranges. DateRangeField supports >> contiguous ranges only. >> >> >> > However, I get an error when trying to insert this value: >> > >> > >> > "error":{"metadata": >> > >> > >> > >> ["error-class","org.apache.solr.common.SolrException","root-error-class","java.lang.NumberFormatException"], >> > >> > "msg":"ERROR: Error adding field 'dtRange'='2000T13' msg=Couldn't >> > parse date because: Improperly formatted date: 2000T13","code":400 >> > >> > } >> > >> > >> > I am using 7.6 with a super simple schema containing only _version_ and >> a >> > DateRangeField and there's nothing special in my solrconfig.xml. Is >> this >> > behavior expected? Should I open a jira issue? >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Jeremy >> > >> >> >> -- >> Sincerely yours >> Mikhail Khludnev >> > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev
