Hi Mikhail, thanks for the response. I'm probably missing something, but what makes 2000-11T13 contiguous and 2000T13 not contiguous? They seem pretty similar to me, but only the former is supported.
Thanks, Jeremy ________________________________ From: Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2019 12:59:31 AM To: solr-user Subject: Re: DateRangeField requires month? Hello, Jeremy. See below. On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:09 PM Jeremy Smith <jas2...@cornell.edu> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to use the DateRangeField and ran into an interesting > issue. According to the documentation ( > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/working-with-dates.html), these > are both valid for the DateRangeField: 2000-11 and 2000-11T13. I can > confirm this is working in 7.6. I would also expect to be able to use > 2000T13, which would mean any time in the year 2000 between 1300 and 1400. Nope. This is not a range, but multiple ranges. DateRangeField supports contiguous ranges only. > However, I get an error when trying to insert this value: > > > "error":{"metadata": > > > ["error-class","org.apache.solr.common.SolrException","root-error-class","java.lang.NumberFormatException"], > > "msg":"ERROR: Error adding field 'dtRange'='2000T13' msg=Couldn't > parse date because: Improperly formatted date: 2000T13","code":400 > > } > > > I am using 7.6 with a super simple schema containing only _version_ and a > DateRangeField and there's nothing special in my solrconfig.xml. Is this > behavior expected? Should I open a jira issue? > > > Thanks, > > Jeremy > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev
