Now you are mixing your original question about performance with reliability
On 12 Mar 2018 02:29, "BlackIce" <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote: > Second to this wouldn't 4 Solr instances each with its own HD be fault > tolerant? vs. one solr instance with 4 HD's in RAID 0? Plus to his comes > the storage capacity, I need the capacity of those 4 drives... the more I > read.. the more questions.... > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:43 PM, BlackIce <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thnx for the pointers. > > > > I haven't given much thought to Solr, asides shemal.xml and > solrconfig.xml > > and I'm just diving into a bit more deeper stuff! > > > > Greetz > > > > RRK > > > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Deepak Goel <deic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> To rephrase your Question > >> > >> "Does Solr do well with Scale-up or Scale-out?" > >> > >> Are there any Performance Benchmarks for the same out there supporting > the > >> claim? > >> > >> On 11 Mar 2018 23:05, "BlackIce" <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I have some questions regarding performance. > >> > > >> > Lets says I have a dual CPU with a total of 8 cores and 24 GB RAM for > my > >> > Solr and some other stuff. > >> > > >> > Would it be more beneficial to only run 1 instance of Solr with the > >> > collection stored on 4 HD's in RAID 0?? Or.... Have several Virtual > >> > Machines each running of its own HD, ie: Have 4 VM's running Solr? > >> > > >> > Any Thoughts? > >> > > >> > Thank you! > >> > > >> > RRK > >> > > >> > > > > >
