Second to this wouldn't 4 Solr instances each with its own HD be fault tolerant? vs. one solr instance with 4 HD's in RAID 0? Plus to his comes the storage capacity, I need the capacity of those 4 drives... the more I read.. the more questions....
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:43 PM, BlackIce <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thnx for the pointers. > > I haven't given much thought to Solr, asides shemal.xml and solrconfig.xml > and I'm just diving into a bit more deeper stuff! > > Greetz > > RRK > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Deepak Goel <deic...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> To rephrase your Question >> >> "Does Solr do well with Scale-up or Scale-out?" >> >> Are there any Performance Benchmarks for the same out there supporting the >> claim? >> >> On 11 Mar 2018 23:05, "BlackIce" <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I have some questions regarding performance. >> > >> > Lets says I have a dual CPU with a total of 8 cores and 24 GB RAM for my >> > Solr and some other stuff. >> > >> > Would it be more beneficial to only run 1 instance of Solr with the >> > collection stored on 4 HD's in RAID 0?? Or.... Have several Virtual >> > Machines each running of its own HD, ie: Have 4 VM's running Solr? >> > >> > Any Thoughts? >> > >> > Thank you! >> > >> > RRK >> > >> > >
