ryantxu wrote:
...
Yes, I would like to see a way to specify all the fieldtypes /
handlers in one location and then only specify what fields are
available for each core.
So yes -- I agree. In 2.0, I hope to flush out configs so they are
not monstrous.
...
What about using "include" so each core can have a minimal specific
configuration and schema & everything else shared between them?
Something akin to what's allowed by solr-646.
Just couldn't resist :-)
Henri
somehow I knew that was coming :)
Yes, include would get us some of the way there, but not far enough
(IMHO). The problem is that (as written) you still need to have all
the configs spattered about various directories.
ryan
