ryantxu wrote:
>
> ...
> Yes, I would like to see a way to specify all the fieldtypes /
> handlers in one location and then only specify what fields are
> available for each core.
>
> So yes -- I agree. In 2.0, I hope to flush out configs so they are
> not monstrous.
> ...
>
What about using "include" so each core can have a minimal specific
configuration and schema & everything else shared between them?
Something akin to what's allowed by solr-646.
Just couldn't resist :-)
Henri
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Some-new-SOLR-features-tp19494251p19515526.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
