Thanks!
On 12/20/2017 11:37 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
The schema is not order dependent, I freely mix-n-match the fieldType,
copyField and field definitions for instance.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Michael Joyner <mich...@newsrx.com> wrote:
Hey all,
I'm wanting to update our managed-schemas to include the latest options
available in the 6.6.2 branch. (point types for one)
I would like to be able to sort them and diff them (production vs dist
supplied) to create a simple patch that can be reviewed, edited if
necessary, and then applied to the production schemas.
I'm thinking this approach would be least human error prone, but, the
schemas would need to be diffable and I can only see this as doable if they
are sorted so that common parts diff out. I only see this approach easily
workable if the entries aren't order dependent. (Presuming I can get all the
various schema settings to fit neatly on single lines...).
Or does there exist a list of schema entries added along different point
releases?
-Mike/NewsRx
