The schema is not order dependent, I freely mix-n-match the fieldType, copyField and field definitions for instance.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Michael Joyner <mich...@newsrx.com> wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm wanting to update our managed-schemas to include the latest options > available in the 6.6.2 branch. (point types for one) > > I would like to be able to sort them and diff them (production vs dist > supplied) to create a simple patch that can be reviewed, edited if > necessary, and then applied to the production schemas. > > I'm thinking this approach would be least human error prone, but, the > schemas would need to be diffable and I can only see this as doable if they > are sorted so that common parts diff out. I only see this approach easily > workable if the entries aren't order dependent. (Presuming I can get all the > various schema settings to fit neatly on single lines...). > > Or does there exist a list of schema entries added along different point > releases? > > -Mike/NewsRx >
