Sorry Eric. I will check and raise it under SOLR project. Thanks! Mark.
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mark: > > KYLIN-1644? This should be SOLR-####. I suspect you entered the JIRA > in the wrong Apache project..... > > > Erick > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Mark Robinson <mark123lea...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > > > I have raised a JIRA:- *KYLIN-1644* with the problem mentioned. > > > > Thanks! > > Mark. > > > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Mark Robinson <mark123lea...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks much Eric for checking in detail. > >> Yes I found the first term being left out in pf. > >> Because of that I had some cases where a couple of unwanted records came > >> in the results with higher priority than the normal ones. When I checked > >> they matched from the 2nd term onwards. > >> > >> As suggested I wud raise a JIRA. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Mark > >> > >> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Erick Erickson < > erickerick...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Looks like a bug in edismax to me when you field-qualify > >>> the terms. > >>> > >>> As an aside, there's no need to specify the field when you only > >>> want it to go against the fields defined in "qf" and "pf" etc. And, > >>> that's a work-around for this particular case. But still: > >>> > >>> So here's what I get on 5x: > >>> q=(erick men truck)&defType=edismax&qf=name&pf=name > >>> correctly returns: > >>> "+((name:erick) (name:men) (name:truck)) (name:"erick men truck")", > >>> > >>> But, > >>> q=name:(erick men truck)&defType=edismax&qf=name&pf=name > >>> incorrectly returns: > >>> "+(name:erick name:men name:truck) (name:"men truck")", > >>> > >>> And this: > >>> q=name:(erick men truck)&defType=edismax&qf=name&pf=features > >>> incorrectly gives this. > >>> > >>> "+(name:erick name:men name:truck) (features:"men truck")", > >>> > >>> Confusingly, the terms (with "erick" left out, strike 1) > >>> goes against the pf field even though it's fully qualified against the > >>> name field. Not entirely sure whether this is intended or not frankly. > >>> > >>> Please go ahead and raise a JIRA. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Erick > >>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Mark Robinson < > mark123lea...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Hi, > >>> > > >>> > q=productType:(two piece bathtub white) > >>> > &defType=edismax&pf=productType^20.0&qf=productType^15.0 > >>> > > >>> > In the debug section this is what I see:- > >>> > <str name="parsedquery"> > >>> > (+(productType:two productType:piec productType:bathtub > >>> productType:white) > >>> > DisjunctionMaxQuery((productType:"piec bathtub > white"^20.0)))/no_coord > >>> > </str> > >>> > > >>> > My question is related to the "pf" (phrases) section of edismax. > >>> > As shown in the debug section why is the phrase taken as "piec > bathtub > >>> > white". Why is the first word "two" not considered in the phrase > fields > >>> > section. > >>> > I am looking for queries with the words "two piece bathtub white" > being > >>> > together to be boosted and not "piece bathtub white" only to be > boosted. > >>> > > >>> > Could some one help me understand what I am missing? > >>> > > >>> > Thanks! > >>> > Mark > >>> > >> > >> >
