Mark: KYLIN-1644? This should be SOLR-####. I suspect you entered the JIRA in the wrong Apache project.....
Erick On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Mark Robinson <mark123lea...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I have raised a JIRA:- *KYLIN-1644* with the problem mentioned. > > Thanks! > Mark. > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Mark Robinson <mark123lea...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks much Eric for checking in detail. >> Yes I found the first term being left out in pf. >> Because of that I had some cases where a couple of unwanted records came >> in the results with higher priority than the normal ones. When I checked >> they matched from the 2nd term onwards. >> >> As suggested I wud raise a JIRA. >> >> Thanks! >> Mark >> >> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Looks like a bug in edismax to me when you field-qualify >>> the terms. >>> >>> As an aside, there's no need to specify the field when you only >>> want it to go against the fields defined in "qf" and "pf" etc. And, >>> that's a work-around for this particular case. But still: >>> >>> So here's what I get on 5x: >>> q=(erick men truck)&defType=edismax&qf=name&pf=name >>> correctly returns: >>> "+((name:erick) (name:men) (name:truck)) (name:"erick men truck")", >>> >>> But, >>> q=name:(erick men truck)&defType=edismax&qf=name&pf=name >>> incorrectly returns: >>> "+(name:erick name:men name:truck) (name:"men truck")", >>> >>> And this: >>> q=name:(erick men truck)&defType=edismax&qf=name&pf=features >>> incorrectly gives this. >>> >>> "+(name:erick name:men name:truck) (features:"men truck")", >>> >>> Confusingly, the terms (with "erick" left out, strike 1) >>> goes against the pf field even though it's fully qualified against the >>> name field. Not entirely sure whether this is intended or not frankly. >>> >>> Please go ahead and raise a JIRA. >>> >>> Best, >>> Erick >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Mark Robinson <mark123lea...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > q=productType:(two piece bathtub white) >>> > &defType=edismax&pf=productType^20.0&qf=productType^15.0 >>> > >>> > In the debug section this is what I see:- >>> > <str name="parsedquery"> >>> > (+(productType:two productType:piec productType:bathtub >>> productType:white) >>> > DisjunctionMaxQuery((productType:"piec bathtub white"^20.0)))/no_coord >>> > </str> >>> > >>> > My question is related to the "pf" (phrases) section of edismax. >>> > As shown in the debug section why is the phrase taken as "piec bathtub >>> > white". Why is the first word "two" not considered in the phrase fields >>> > section. >>> > I am looking for queries with the words "two piece bathtub white" being >>> > together to be boosted and not "piece bathtub white" only to be boosted. >>> > >>> > Could some one help me understand what I am missing? >>> > >>> > Thanks! >>> > Mark >>> >> >>
