Thanks for the suggestion Joe. I will check on it. Thanks! Mark.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com> wrote: > Check out the new docs for the gatherNodes streaming expression. it Allows > you to aggregate and then use those aggregates as input for another > expression. You can even do this across collections. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=62693238 > > This is slated for Solr 6.1 > > > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Mark Robinson <mark123lea...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks much everyone! > > Appreciate your responses. > > > > Best, > > Mark > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On the same lines as Erik suggested but using facet stats instead. you > > can > > > get stats on your facet fields in the first pass and then include the > > > facets that you need in the second pass. > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 27, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Mark Robinson <mark123lea...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks Eric! > > > > So that will mean another call will be definitely required to SOLR > with > > > the > > > > facets, before the results can be send back (with the facet fields > > being > > > > derived traversing through the response). > > > > > > > > I was basically checking on whether in the "process" method (I > believe > > > > results will be accessed in the process method), we can dynamically > > > > generate facets after traversing through the results and identifying > > the > > > > fields for faceting, using some aggregation function or so, without > > > having > > > > to make another call using facet=on&facet.field=<field_name>, before > > the > > > > response is send back to the user. > > > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Erik Hatcher < > erik.hatc...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Results will vary based on how you indexed those fields, but sure… > > > >> &facet=on&facet.field=<field_name> - with sufficient RAM, lots of > fun > > > to be > > > >> had! > > > >> > > > >> — > > > >> Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect > > > >> http://www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>> On Apr 27, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Mark Robinson < > > mark123lea...@gmail.com> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> If I don't have my facet list at query time, from the results can I > > > >> select > > > >>> some fields and by any means create a facet on them? ie after I get > > the > > > >>> results I want to identify some fields as facets and send back > facets > > > for > > > >>> them in the response. > > > >>> > > > >>> A kind of very dynamic faceting based on the results! > > > >>> > > > >>> Cld some one pls share their idea. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks! > > > >>> Anil. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
