Thanks much everyone! Appreciate your responses. Best, Mark
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On the same lines as Erik suggested but using facet stats instead. you can > get stats on your facet fields in the first pass and then include the > facets that you need in the second pass. > > > > On Apr 27, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Mark Robinson <mark123lea...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Thanks Eric! > > So that will mean another call will be definitely required to SOLR with > the > > facets, before the results can be send back (with the facet fields being > > derived traversing through the response). > > > > I was basically checking on whether in the "process" method (I believe > > results will be accessed in the process method), we can dynamically > > generate facets after traversing through the results and identifying the > > fields for faceting, using some aggregation function or so, without > having > > to make another call using facet=on&facet.field=<field_name>, before the > > response is send back to the user. > > > > Cheers! > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Results will vary based on how you indexed those fields, but sure… > >> &facet=on&facet.field=<field_name> - with sufficient RAM, lots of fun > to be > >> had! > >> > >> — > >> Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect > >> http://www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/> > >> > >> > >> > >>>> On Apr 27, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Mark Robinson <mark123lea...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> If I don't have my facet list at query time, from the results can I > >> select > >>> some fields and by any means create a facet on them? ie after I get the > >>> results I want to identify some fields as facets and send back facets > for > >>> them in the response. > >>> > >>> A kind of very dynamic faceting based on the results! > >>> > >>> Cld some one pls share their idea. > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> Anil. > >> > >> >
