Yes. i was looking for some kind of event listeners for client :)

On 26 March 2016 at 21:46, Andrea Gazzarini <gxs...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Anil,
> If with "Application" you mean an external / remote Application then
> there's no such pre-built mechanism to do that.
>
> The event is not notifies "in" your application or "to" your application.
> Solr knows nothing about it.
>
> Specifically, event listeners allows you to do something when a given event
> happens...what exactly is "something" it's up to you; for instance you
> could (asynch) send a http message to your API, send a message to a queue,
> send a GCM message to some mobile device, or in general: everything :) but
> again, this is up to you.
>
> Andrea
> On 26 Mar 2016 15:46, "Anil" <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > HI Alex,
> >
> > i am still no clear how an event is notified in my application if it
> > listener is configured in SolrConfig.xml (centralized solr server). can
> you
> > please clarify?
> >
> > Sorry for dumb question.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anil
> >
> > On 26 March 2016 at 19:48, Andrea Gazzarini <gxs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Anil,
> > > see here [1] where I did some data pre-loading at solr startup. The
> post
> > > has been written in 2014 so maybe something could have a different name
> > > (class, methods)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Andrea
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://andreagazzarini.blogspot.it/2014/11/preloading-data-at-solr-startup.html
> > > On 26 Mar 2016 15:14, "Anil" <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Alex. Let me digg more in that area.
> > > >
> > > > On 26 March 2016 at 19:40, Andrea Gazzarini <gxs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Event listeners are custom classes so you could do
> > > "anything"....however
> > > > I
> > > > > guess the event firing is synchronous so the listener logic should
> be
> > > > > no-blocking and as fast as possible.
> > > > >
> > > > > But this is my guess, I hadn't look at the code. Instead, if the
> > > listener
> > > > > invocation is asynch then forget my comment, the answer is yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Andrea
> > > > > On 26 Mar 2016 15:03, "Anil" <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Can solr notify other systems on commit of document ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 26 March 2016 at 13:59, Alexandre Rafalovitch <
> > arafa...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well, the updated documents are not visible until the commit.
> So,
> > > > > > > perhaps you just need the commit listeners then. Those could be
> > any
> > > > > > > external scripts I believe.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >    Alex.
> > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
> > > > > > > http://www.solr-start.com/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 26 March 2016 at 17:14, Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Thanks Alex.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > i have gone through it. i am building a use case where cache
> > has
> > > to
> > > > > > > updated
> > > > > > > > in my application when there is update or addition of solr
> > > document
> > > > > > > happens.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > i am not sure event listeners  of Update handler would fit
> the
> > > use
> > > > > > case.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What do you say ? please share your ideas.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Anil
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 26 March 2016 at 10:26, Alexandre Rafalovitch <
> > > > arafa...@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Have you looked at UpdateRequestProcessors?
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Plus check solrconfig.xml for listeners on commit.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > > >>     Alex
> > > > > > > >> On 26 Mar 2016 3:54 pm, "Anil" <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > HI,
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Does solr support event (document create, update, delete)
> > > > > listeners
> > > > > > ?
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> > Anil
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to