me too... [ ] Keep solr logging as it is. (JDK Logging) [X] Use SLF4J.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just read through the dev list's thread.. and I'm voting for SLF4J as > well. > > Thanks! > > Matthew Runo > Software Developer > Zappos.com > 702.943.7833 > > On May 6, 2008, at 7:40 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote: >> >> Hello- >> >> There has been a long running thread on solr-dev proposing switching >> the logging system to use something other then JDK logging. >> http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Logging-td16836646.html >> http://www.nabble.com/logging-through-log4j-td13747253.html >> >> We are considering using http://www.slf4j.org/. Check: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-560 >> >> The "pro" argument is that: >> * SLFJ allows more flexibility for people using solr outside the >> canned .war to configure logging without touching JDK logging. >> >> The "con" argument goes something like: >> * JDK logging is already is the standard logging framework. >> * JDK logging is already in in use. >> * SLF4J adds another dependency (for something that already works) >> >> On the dev lists there are a strong opinions on either side, but we >> would like to get a larger sampling of option and validation before >> making this change. >> >> [ ] Keep solr logging as it is. (JDK Logging) >> [ ] Use SLF4J. >> >> As an bonus question (this time fill in the blank): >> I have tried SOLR-560 with my logging system and >> ___________________________. >> >> thanks >> ryan >> > >
