Hoss has shamed me into taking a position on this.
I didn't vote earlier, because I have no real experience with SLF4J,
other than indirectly via our use of Jetty.
But I do know that we'd have to do _something_ for logging when we
switch to embedded Solr.
Under the hood we now use Log4J everywhere, so finishing up my
earlier work on creating a JUL logger that bridged to Log4J was
another option, but one I'd rather avoid.
So...
[ ] Keep solr logging as it is. (JDK Logging)
[X] Use SLF4J.
-- Ken
--
Ken Krugler
Krugle, Inc.
+1 530-210-6378
"If you can't find it, you can't fix it"
