Oh my. Sorry SOLR-5662 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5662> is a duplicate for SOLR-5882, where the patch exists. I appreciate if someone from committers can nail it down.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Michael Sokolov < msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote: > On 1/31/2015 2:47 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > >> Michael, >> >> Please check two questions inlined below >> > Hi Mikhail, > >> >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Michael Sokolov < >> msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote: >> >> >> You can only handle a single relation this way since you have to >> restructure your index to use it; grouping is more flexible. >> >> Michael, >> would you mind to comment which relations you need to model particularly? >> BJQ is definitely much restrictive than grouping, but still have some >> flexibility to cover the most frequent demands. >> >> This was really a theoretical comment only - in our case we only had a > single relation (book->chapter), and the parent->child join worked out > great. > >> Would you mind to leave your vote >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5662 it's not a big deal to >> implement. >> >> Sure, I just voted for the issue. In my case, I used the max score. > > -Mike > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev Principal Engineer, Grid Dynamics <http://www.griddynamics.com> <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
