31.01.2015, 23:23, "Michael Sokolov" <msoko...@safaribooksonline.com>:
> On 1/31/2015 2:47 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>> Michael,
>>
>> Please check two questions inlined below
>
> Hi Mikhail,
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Michael Sokolov <
>> msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote:
>>
>> You can only handle a single relation this way since you have to
>> restructure your index to use it; grouping is more flexible.
>>
>> Michael,
>> would you mind to comment which relations you need to model particularly?
>> BJQ is definitely much restrictive than grouping, but still have some
>> flexibility to cover the most frequent demands.
>
> This was really a theoretical comment only - in our case we only had a
> single relation (book->chapter), and the parent->child join worked out
> great.
>> Would you mind to leave your vote
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5662 it's not a big deal to
>> implement.
>
> Sure, I just voted for the issue. In my case, I used the max score.
>
> -Mike
