Indeed! It’s always been a goal/dream of mine to have the tutorial/quickstart
be more “integrated” like that.
I’ve got some ideas/techniques in the works to make this smooth and clean.
Coming soon (mid/late December as my plate empties for Xmas time), but by all
means feel free to start posting JIRAs/patches on where you’d like it to go and
we’ll sync up. Thanks, Alexandre!
Erik
> On Nov 29, 2014, at 8:25 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Could be nice to have the tutorial then as a runnable Solr core. With
> tutorial text, perhaps, showing up as an admin-extra or some such.
>
> Would that be of interest?
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
> Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
> Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
> Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
>
>
> On 29 November 2014 at 19:53, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You can still do the same thing with the solr-core JAR (note the CLASSPATH
>> in the tutorial).
>>
>> I didn't want the new tutorial to rely on example/exampledocs directory, and
>> to be able to run from the root directory.
>>
>> The embedded tutorial does need to be removed, or cloned. Removing it seems
>> best to avoid duplication. But it's also nice to have it built in and
>> versioned. Suggestions and patches welcome.
>>
>> Erik
>>
>>> On Nov 29, 2014, at 19:27, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> But before you could take that jar to another machine or whatever.
>>> Plus, it run on Windows (I am reading SOLR-6435). Maybe it's opposite
>>> and this single class does not need to be in the solr-core's jar? Or
>>> the price of duplication is not that big. At least until we build a
>>> full-blown client.
>>>
>>> And - like I mentioned in the SOLR-6077 (found it after the email),
>>> how does this impact the tutorial we ship with Solr. Or, are we
>>> deleting that as well?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alex.
>>> Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
>>> Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
>>> Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 29 November 2014 at 19:15, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I removed reference to it as the same class is in solr-core's JAR.
>>>>
>>>> The idea is to hide the details behind bin/post and before end of year
>>>> (before 5.0 release at least) to get that taken care of.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe post.jar can go away completely, but with bin/post the internal
>>>> details won't matter.
>>>>
>>>> Erik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 29, 2014, at 17:07, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody knows why the new online tutorial no longer mentions post.jar
>>>>> : http://lucene.apache.org/solr/quickstart.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Instead the command line offered is:
>>>>>
>>>>> java -Dauto -Drecursive org.apache.solr.util.SimplePostTool docs/
>>>>>
>>>>> The post.jar is still there in both 4.10.2 and - so far - in 5.
>>>>>
>>>>> Color me very confused.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Alex.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
>>>>> Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
>>>>> Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
