It seems like by-design https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211 you can't update a parent doc from the block.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> wrote: > The list of docs before do partial update: > <doc> > <field name="id">product01</field> > <field name="name">car</field> > <field name="content_type">product</field> > <doc> > <field name="id">part01</field> > <field name="name">wheels</field> > <field name="content_type">part</field> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">part02</field> > <field name="name">engine</field> > <field name="doctype">part</field> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">part03</field> > <field name="name">brakes</field> > <field name="content_type">part</field> > </doc> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">product02</field> > <field name="name">truck</field> > <field name="content_type">product</field> > <doc> > <field name="id">part04</field> > <field name="name">wheels</field> > <field name="content_type">part</field> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">part05</field> > <field name="name">flaps</field> > <field name="doctype">part</field> > </doc> > </doc> > > The list of docs after doing partial update of field read_flag for document > "product01": > <doc> > <field name="id">product01</field> > <field name="name">car</field> > <field name="content_type">product</field> > <field name="read_flag">true</field> > <doc> > <field name="id">part01</field> > <field name="name">wheels</field> > <field name="content_type">part</field> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">part02</field> > <field name="name">engine</field> > <field name="doctype">part</field> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">part03</field> > <field name="name">brakes</field> > <field name="content_type">part</field> > </doc> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">product02</field> > <field name="name">truck</field> > <field name="content_type">product</field> > <doc> > <field name="id">part04</field> > <field name="name">wheels</field> > <field name="content_type">part</field> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">part05</field> > <field name="name">flaps</field> > <field name="doctype">part</field> > </doc> > </doc> > > The list of documents after sending same documents again. (it should > overwrite on the last one because of duplicate IDs) > <doc> > <field name="id">product01</field> > <field name="name">car</field> > <field name="content_type">product</field> > <field name="read_flag">true</field> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">product01</field> > <field name="name">car</field> > <field name="content_type">product</field> > <doc> > <field name="id">part01</field> > <field name="name">wheels</field> > <field name="content_type">part</field> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">part02</field> > <field name="name">engine</field> > <field name="doctype">part</field> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">part03</field> > <field name="name">brakes</field> > <field name="content_type">part</field> > </doc> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">product02</field> > <field name="name">truck</field> > <field name="content_type">product</field> > <doc> > <field name="id">part04</field> > <field name="name">wheels</field> > <field name="content_type">part</field> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">part05</field> > <field name="name">flaps</field> > <field name="doctype">part</field> > </doc> > </doc> > > But as you can see there are two different version of documents with the > same ID (which is product01). > > Regards. > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Can you upload the update documents then (into a Gist or similar). > > Just so that people didn't have to re-imagine exact steps. Because, if > > it fully checks out, it might be a bug and the next step would be > > creating a JIRA ticket. > > > > Regards, > > Alex. > > Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov > > Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart > > Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853 > > > > > > On 6 October 2014 11:23, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Alex, > > > Hi, > > > LOL, yeah I am sure. You can test it yourself. I did that on default > > schema > > > too. The results are same! > > > Regards. > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch < > > arafa...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> A stupid question: Are you sure that what schema thinks your uniqueId > > >> is - is the uniqueId in your setup? Also, that you are not somehow > > >> using the flags to tell Solr to ignore duplicates? > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Alex. > > >> Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov > > >> Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and > > @solrstart > > >> Solr popularizers community: > > https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853 > > >> > > >> > > >> On 6 October 2014 03:40, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > Dear all, > > >> > Hi, > > >> > I am going to do partial update on a field that has not any value. > > >> Suppose > > >> > I have a document with document id (unique key) '12345' and field > > >> > "read_flag" which does not index at the first place. So the > read_flag > > >> field > > >> > for this document has not any value. After I did partial update to > > this > > >> > document to set "read_flag"="true", I faced strange problem. Next > > time I > > >> > indexed same document with same values I saw two different version > of > > >> > document with id '12345' in solr. One of them with read_flag=true > and > > >> > another one without read_flag field! I dont want to have duplicate > > >> > documents (as it should not to be because of unique_key id). Would > you > > >> > please tell me what caused such problem? > > >> > Best regards. > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > A.Nazemian > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > A.Nazemian > > > > > > -- > A.Nazemian > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev Principal Engineer, Grid Dynamics <http://www.griddynamics.com> <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
