Can you upload the update documents then (into a Gist or similar). Just so that people didn't have to re-imagine exact steps. Because, if it fully checks out, it might be a bug and the next step would be creating a JIRA ticket.
Regards, Alex. Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853 On 6 October 2014 11:23, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Alex, > Hi, > LOL, yeah I am sure. You can test it yourself. I did that on default schema > too. The results are same! > Regards. > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> A stupid question: Are you sure that what schema thinks your uniqueId >> is - is the uniqueId in your setup? Also, that you are not somehow >> using the flags to tell Solr to ignore duplicates? >> >> Regards, >> Alex. >> Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov >> Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart >> Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853 >> >> >> On 6 October 2014 03:40, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Dear all, >> > Hi, >> > I am going to do partial update on a field that has not any value. >> Suppose >> > I have a document with document id (unique key) '12345' and field >> > "read_flag" which does not index at the first place. So the read_flag >> field >> > for this document has not any value. After I did partial update to this >> > document to set "read_flag"="true", I faced strange problem. Next time I >> > indexed same document with same values I saw two different version of >> > document with id '12345' in solr. One of them with read_flag=true and >> > another one without read_flag field! I dont want to have duplicate >> > documents (as it should not to be because of unique_key id). Would you >> > please tell me what caused such problem? >> > Best regards. >> > >> > -- >> > A.Nazemian >> > > > > -- > A.Nazemian
