On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Matt M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So if my facet fields (and values) are changing depending on the > query/filters I have set, it sounds like it is not currently possible to > paginate through a single, facet field's values using a "total pages" value?
Right. A feature like that could be developed, but the cost is not simply a counter... it would mean extra CPU since the current facet code short-circuits evaluation of some facets, and that would not be possible if one is trying to calculate that exact number. -Yonik
