thoughts on requiring that for solrj? perhaps in 2.0? Not suggesting
it is a good idea (yet)... but we may want to consider it.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Hmmm, I should have just mandated that the id field be called "id"
from the start :-)
On Feb 11, 2008 5:51 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's the best way to retrieve the unique key field from SolrJ? From
what I can tell, it seems like I would need to retrieve the schema and
then parse it and get it from there, or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Grant
