: Another option is to add it to the responseHeader????  Or it could be a quick
: add to the LukeRH.  The former has the advantage that we wouldn't have to make

adding the info to LukeRequestHandler makes sense.

Honestly: i can't think of a single use case where client code would care 
about what the uniqueKey field is, unless it already *knew* what the 
uniqueKey field is.

: Of course, it probably would be useful to be able to request the schema from
: the server and build an IndexSchema object on the client side.  This could be
: added to the LukeRH as well.

somebody was working on that at some point ... but i may be thinking of 
the Ruby client ... no.... i'm pretty sure i remember it coming up in the 
context of Java because i remember dicsussion that a full "IndexSchema" 
was too much because it required the client to have the class files for 
all of the analysis chain and filedtype classes.



-Hoss

Reply via email to