Eswar,

I wouldn't worry about the performance of those CJK analyzers too much - they 
are fairly trivial.  The StandardAnalyzer is slower, for example.  I recently 
indexed cca 20MM large docs on a 8-core, 8 GB RAM box in 10 hours - 550 
docs/second.  No CJK, just English.

Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch

----- Original Message ----
From: Eswar K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 9:27:15 PM
Subject: Re: CJK Analyzers for Solr

thanks james...

How much time does it take to index 18m docs?

- Eswar

On Nov 27, 2007 7:43 AM, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> i not use HYLANDA analyzer.
>
> i use je-analyzer and indexing at least 18m docs.
>
> i m sorry i only use chinese analyzer.
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2007 10:01 AM, Eswar K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What is the performance of these CJK analyzers (one in lucene and
> hylanda
> > )?
> > We would potentially be indexing millions of documents.
> >
> > James,
> >
> > We would have a look at hylanda too. What abt japanese and korean
> > analyzers,
> > any recommendations?
> >
> > - Eswar
> >
> > On Nov 27, 2007 7:21 AM, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think NGram is good method for Chinese.
> > >
> > > CJKAnalyzer of Lucene is 2-Gram.
> > >
> > > Eswar K:
> > >  if it is chinese analyzer,,i recommend
 hylanda(www.hylanda.com),,,it
> is
> > > the best chinese analyzer and it not free.
> > >  if u wanna free chinese analyzer, maybe u can try je-analyzer.
 it
> have
> > > some problem when using it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 27, 2007 5:56 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Eswar,
> > > >
> > > > We've uses the NGram stuff that exists in Lucene's
 contrib/analyzers
> > > > instead of CJK.  Doesn't that allow you to do everything that
 the
> > > Chinese
> > > > and CJK analyzers do?  It's been a few months since I've looked
 at
> > > Chinese
> > > > and CJK Analzyers, so I could be off.
> > > >
> > > > Otis
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > > From: Eswar K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 8:30:52 AM
> > > > Subject: CJK Analyzers for Solr
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Does Solr come with Language analyzers for CJK? If not, can you
> please
> > > > direct me to some good CJK analyzers?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Eswar
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > regards
> > > jl
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> regards
> jl
>



Reply via email to