James - can you elaborate on why you think the n-gram approach is not good for Chinese?
Thanks, Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- From: James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 8:51:23 PM Subject: Re: CJK Analyzers for Solr I don't think NGram is good method for Chinese. CJKAnalyzer of Lucene is 2-Gram. Eswar K: if it is chinese analyzer,,i recommend hylanda（www.hylanda.com）,,,it is the best chinese analyzer and it not free. if u wanna free chinese analyzer, maybe u can try je-analyzer. it have some problem when using it. On Nov 27, 2007 5:56 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eswar, > > We've uses the NGram stuff that exists in Lucene's contrib/analyzers > instead of CJK. Doesn't that allow you to do everything that the Chinese > and CJK analyzers do? It's been a few months since I've looked at Chinese > and CJK Analzyers, so I could be off. > > Otis > > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Eswar K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 8:30:52 AM > Subject: CJK Analyzers for Solr > > Hi, > > Does Solr come with Language analyzers for CJK? If not, can you please > direct me to some good CJK analyzers? > > Regards, > Eswar > > > > -- regards jl
