On 25-Oct-07, at 4:50 PM, patrick o'leary wrote:

It might be good though to have an interim release say 1.2.x
Which would simply allow patches, and valuable contributions to get added to the trunk.

I'm not sure what you mean. The "problem" is that there lots of valuable contributions in trunk that haven't gotten shook out sufficiently yet, not that we're holding them up.

If we did a 1.2.x, it shoud (imo) contain no new features, only important bugfixes.

Right now, there are a few items which are falling behind because the trunk code is changing rapidly.

Again, I'm not sure what you mean by "falling behind". We've got a few major code restructuring changes currently in trunk--they need time to shake out. I would be onboard with a proprosal to limit major things under consideration ƒor 1.3 to the things we are already close to finishing.

If you mean that there are a lot of small tweaks that the community doesn't have access to because we haven't done a release, I'm inclined to agree that that would be ideal. It is more work to do maintain that kind of release schedule (requires work on multiple branches at once).

-Mike

Reply via email to