It might be good though to have an interim release say 1.2.x
Which would simply allow patches, and valuable contributions to get added to the trunk.

Right now, there are a few items which are falling behind because the trunk code is changing rapidly.

A 1.2.x release will give you the opportunity to start defining what the 1.3 release will look like
and include.

P

Ryan McKinley wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 10/25/07, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any ideas on when 1.3 might be released? We're starting a new project
and I'd love to use 1.3 for it - is SVN head stable enough for use?

I think it's stable in the sense of "does the right thing and doesn't
crash", but IMO
isn't stable in the sense that new interfaces (internal and external)
added since 1.2 may still be changing.


A lot has been added since 1.2 -- if you have the time/temperament to be ok interfaces that may be in flux, it is great to have more feedback on how they work/ how they should work.  Since 1.2, i think any bugs or serious problems that have arised (not many) have been fixed within a day or two.  (as good as paid support!)

Note the public interfaces from 1.2 are (and will be) totally compatible with 1.3 - the only interface issues you may run into are if you are writing custom code or using new features added since 1.2


Lots of new stuff going in (and has gone in), and I wouldn't expect to
see 1.3 super soon.
Just IMO of course.


I don't think it is soon either -- there are a few big things that need to get in and have time to settle before locking into public APIs

ryan









--
Patrick O'Leary

You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles.
 Do you understand this? 
And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat.
  - Albert Einstein
View Patrick O Leary's LinkedIn profileView Patrick O Leary's profile

Reply via email to