Enable leading wildcards and try this: type:changelog AND filename:*angel*
wunder On 4/25/07 1:34 PM, "Michael Kimsal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks. I'm still no results with your suggestion though. I also tried > > type:+changelog AND ( (filename:angel) OR (filename:angel*) OR > (filename:*angel) ) > > but am getting parse errors. :( > > > On 4/25/07, Cody Caughlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> What about: >> >> (type:changelog) AND (filename:angel) >> >> Or if you do the 3 different type of filename queries, use parenthesis >> to properly break them up, e..g >> >> type:changelog AND (filename:... OR filename:... OR filename:...) >> >> I dont know enough about how Lucene's precedence rules, but you might >> have better luck with this kind of grouping. >> >> /cody >> >> On 4/25/07, Michael Kimsal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hello all: >>> >>> I'm trying to find a record in my index where the 'type' is changelog >> and >>> the 'filename' has 'angel' in it. >>> >>> Expressing this as >>> type:changelog filename:+angel or filename:+angel* or filename:+*angel >>> >>> throws a parse error (probably understandably) >>> >>> type:changelog (filename:+angel or filename:+angel* or filename:+*angel) >>> doesn't seem to work either. >>> >>> I've tried this a number of ways and I either get a parse error or >>> *everything* is returned - I only want >>> records where the type is 'changelog' and the filename has 'angel' in >> it. >>> How would this be expressed? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Michael Kimsal >>> http://webdevradio.com >>> >> > >
