I solved this with the following syntax: *type:changelog AND ( ( (listing:fox) or (listing:fox*) or (listing:*fox) ) )
*That seems to give us what we're looking for. However, it brought up another question which I'll post in a moment. On 4/25/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if use customer Analyzer,,,,, u can use solr admin gui, and click analyzer which can help you use customer analyzer(i use it to be sure my customer analyzer is ok). if u wanna know query syntax ,,,it same with lucene,,so u can read http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/queryparsersyntax.html 2007/4/26, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > What it probably boils down to is how you analyzed (or didn't) those > fields. > > What is your schema for those fields? > > Erik > > > On Apr 25, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Michael Kimsal wrote: > > > leading and trailing at the same time don't work. :( This is > > supposedly > > fixed in a lucene nightly, but I can't get solr and lucene trunks > > to compile > > together. Also, I wouldn't be able to convince anyone here to run > > nightly > > trunks in production. :) > > > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Enable leading wildcards and try this: > >> > >> type:changelog AND filename:*angel* > >> > >> wunder > >> > >> On 4/25/07 1:34 PM, "Michael Kimsal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > Thanks. I'm still no results with your suggestion though. I > >> also tried > >> > > >> > type:+changelog AND ( (filename:angel) OR (filename:angel*) OR > >> > (filename:*angel) ) > >> > > >> > but am getting parse errors. :( > >> > > >> > > >> > On 4/25/07, Cody Caughlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> What about: > >> >> > >> >> (type:changelog) AND (filename:angel) > >> >> > >> >> Or if you do the 3 different type of filename queries, use > >> parenthesis > >> >> to properly break them up, e..g > >> >> > >> >> type:changelog AND (filename:... OR filename:... OR filename:...) > >> >> > >> >> I dont know enough about how Lucene's precedence rules, but you > >> might > >> >> have better luck with this kind of grouping. > >> >> > >> >> /cody > >> >> > >> >> On 4/25/07, Michael Kimsal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>> Hello all: > >> >>> > >> >>> I'm trying to find a record in my index where the 'type' is > >> changelog > >> >> and > >> >>> the 'filename' has 'angel' in it. > >> >>> > >> >>> Expressing this as > >> >>> type:changelog filename:+angel or filename:+angel* or filename: > >> +*angel > >> >>> > >> >>> throws a parse error (probably understandably) > >> >>> > >> >>> type:changelog (filename:+angel or filename:+angel* or > >> filename:+*angel) > >> >>> doesn't seem to work either. > >> >>> > >> >>> I've tried this a number of ways and I either get a parse > >> error or > >> >>> *everything* is returned - I only want > >> >>> records where the type is 'changelog' and the filename has > >> 'angel' in > >> >> it. > >> >>> How would this be expressed? > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Michael Kimsal > >> >>> http://webdevradio.com > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Michael Kimsal > > http://webdevradio.com > > -- regards jl
-- Michael Kimsal http://webdevradio.com
