I’ve previously seen code contributed back in that way. See bug 1611 as an example (happened to have looked at that just yesterday).
-- ____ || \\UTGERS, |---------------------------*O*--------------------------- ||_// the State | Ryan Novosielski - novos...@rutgers.edu<mailto:novos...@rutgers.edu> || \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 (2x0922) ~*~ RBHS Campus || \\ of NJ | Office of Advanced Research Computing - MSB C630, Newark `' On Sep 30, 2020, at 11:29, Relu Patrascu <r...@cs.toronto.edu> wrote: Thanks Ryan, I'll try the bugs site. And indeed, one person in our organization has already said "let's pay for support, maybe they'll listen." :) It's a little bit funny to me that we don't actually need support, but get it hoping that they might consider adding a feature which we think would benefit everyone. We have actually modified the code on both v 19 and 20 to do what we would like, preemption within the same QOS, but we think that the community would benefit from this feature, hence our request to have it in the release version. Relu On 2020-09-30 11:02, Ryan Novosielski wrote: Depends on the issue I think, but the bugs site is often a way to request enhancements, etc. Of course, requests coming from an entity with a support contact carry more weight. -- ____ || \\UTGERS, |---------------------------*O*--------------------------- ||_// the State | Ryan Novosielski - novos...@rutgers.edu<mailto:novos...@rutgers.edu> || \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 (2x0922) ~*~ RBHS Campus || \\ of NJ | Office of Advanced Research Computing - MSB C630, Newark `' On Sep 30, 2020, at 10:57, Relu Patrascu <r...@cs.toronto.edu><mailto:r...@cs.toronto.edu> wrote: Hi all, I posted recently on this mailing list a feature request and got no reply from the developers. Is there a better way to contact the slurm developers or we should just accept that they are not interested in community feedback? Regards, Relu
