Thanks Ryan, I'll try the bugs site. And indeed, one person in our
organization has already said "let's pay for support, maybe they'll
listen." :) It's a little bit funny to me that we don't actually need
support, but get it hoping that they might consider adding a feature
which we think would benefit everyone.
We have actually modified the code on both v 19 and 20 to do what we
would like, preemption within the same QOS, but we think that the
community would benefit from this feature, hence our request to have it
in the release version.
Relu
On 2020-09-30 11:02, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Depends on the issue I think, but the bugs site is often a way to
request enhancements, etc. Of course, requests coming from an entity
with a support contact carry more weight.
--
____
|| \\UTGERS, |---------------------------*O*---------------------------
||_// the State | Ryan Novosielski - novos...@rutgers.edu
<mailto:novos...@rutgers.edu>
|| \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 (2x0922) ~*~ RBHS
Campus
|| \\ of NJ | Office of Advanced Research Computing - MSB
C630, Newark
`'
On Sep 30, 2020, at 10:57, Relu Patrascu <r...@cs.toronto.edu> wrote:
Hi all,
I posted recently on this mailing list a feature request and got no
reply from the developers. Is there a better way to contact the slurm
developers or we should just accept that they are not interested in
community feedback?
Regards,
Relu
